Martyn's Law, one year on: a compliance reality check
Twelve months after Royal Assent, the gap between organisations that took the Act seriously early and those that didn't is widening fast.
A year on from Royal Assent, the picture across the qualifying-premises population is uneven. A meaningful minority of operators — venues, education estates, places of worship, large retail — moved early, built genuine capability, and now have documented procedures, trained staff and an evidenced security plan. Most are some distance behind that.
The pattern in the laggards is recognisable. Tier assessments were done quickly and conservatively, often understating attendance. Procedures were lifted from generic templates and never tested. Staff training was box-ticked through an e-learning module that no duty manager could repeat under pressure. The result is a compliance posture that will not survive a regulator visit, let alone a real event.
Our advice to those still catching up is unglamorous. Re-do the tier assessment honestly. Write the four procedures — evacuation, invacuation, lockdown and communication — in language a sixteen-year-old usher could execute. Run a tabletop. Document everything. The SIA will arrive eventually. The objective is to have answered every question they're going to ask before they arrive.
Related services
More insights
Keep reading.
Related thinking from the Oakwood team.
Martyn's Law: what the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act actually asks of you
A plain-English breakdown of the new statutory duties, the Standard and Enhanced tiers, and where most organisations are underestimating the work.
Operational resilience: what 'beyond March 2025' actually looks like
The FCA's transitional period has closed. The interesting question now isn't whether you're compliant — it's whether the framework you built is doing any real work.
Hostile reconnaissance: what to train your frontline to spot
Attackers almost always look first. The single highest-leverage investment in protective security is often the one that costs the least.
